Peer review is a quality control measure for medical research.
It is a process in which professionals review each other’s work to make sure that it is accurate, relevant, and significant.
Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the Covid-19 injectables.
 |
| Nanobots with your Cocoa Pebbles!? |
The latter sentence originates from, unless someone can (please) prove otherwise, a proper, scientific, peer review study- one with staggering implications and possibly dire consequences. And (unless someone can prove otherwise)- it is scary as shit!
Like many millions of Americans (and others worldwide) during the pandemic, I dutifully took one for the team and got the vaccine- multiple shots of it. I already knew that no vaccine was completely safe, and that this one in particular was being rushed to judgement, but it was hard times- ya bite the bullet and hope for the best... and I sure didn't wanna be that guy on his deathbed, begging for the vaccine, only to have the nurse tell me- "Too late now shithead!"
Now we all had our arguments and disputes concerning the wisdom of getting vaccinated, or not. Afterall, vaccines throughout history have been generally proven to be safe- still, if you ate healthier than I, lived and exercised better than I, yeah- you probably could swing it. But.. as I liked to point out- American Indians, some of the very healthiest people in pre-Columbian times (plenty of exercise and an all organic diet) died by the thousands when exposed to European viruses- Fact. So yeah, I made my bed with the vaccine- and being unemployed if I didn't played no small part.
But if anything made my eyes glaze over when discussing any of the above- it's when people starting talking "nanobots in the vaccine!" Instant flat earth, fake moon landing turf- next channel, please!
So here we are... I got sick a couple of days every time I took the damn shot, and my arm felt like someone took a ball bat to it. "It's a sign it's working," we were told. But they didn't say shit when it came to advertising the "self assembling nanostructures" within- how many subjects suckers would've have taken it had they advertised that!? Anyone feel good about that? Good about being lied too, yet again, by Big Pharma! Anyone feel good having that shit floating around inside ya, doing god knows what? All them right angles, curly cues, ribbons and nano-nuts and bolts?!?
Excuse me, I got some serious apologies to make to people who honestly tried to tell me better... unless someone (other than Big Pharma) can prove this goddamn peer review is just a self assembled pile of shit.
ADDENDUM: Please, note following response listed in subsequent post above.
Investigate EDTA chelation. If rhey can be assembled; they can be disaasembled.
ReplyDeleteWill look into it, but it sounds a bit like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube... are these things even made of metal?
ReplyDeleteGoogle about nicotine dissolving the Nanobots. Not sure it works but it's crowdsourcing to the surface now
DeleteGoogle about Nicotine dissolving the nanobots. Crowdsourcing is bringing this to the surface a bit, but not sure ifvitsvthe Rx
Deletehttps://x.com/asherpress/status/1832036486629183701?s=46&t=0gsb637CQz6GScbcGuLP7Q
ReplyDeleteDr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Peter McCullough have some detox protocols.
https://x.com/cmdrvalthor/status/1819021234601959581?s=46&t=0gsb637CQz6GScbcGuLP7Q
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/vigilantfox/status/1612653493847822337?s=57
ReplyDeleteI’m sorry for your angst. I do want to say that vaccines and other Pharma products are designed to keep you dependent on Pharma for life. Lots of chronic diseases are taken for granted as a cost of being human.
ReplyDeleteI am posting all these links and comments, and people are free to make of them what they will- all I can say is that the 'official' advice and info we've all received have been less than forthright, honest or transparent (to say the least)...
ReplyDeleteYou didn’t get Covid, and you’re still alive. If you’re concerned about the shit floating around in your body, you ought to be more concerned about microplastics. Nano technology (not Nanobots) has been used for years. The recent use of it in MRNA vaccines is an outgrowth of work that’s been ongoing on with cancer drugs.
ReplyDeleteI'm very concerned about microplastics as well, but let's stick to the topic at hand- if nanotechnology, "self assembling" nanotech at that (sounds fairly robotic to me) was all that... How come they didn't make it their big selling point? It's one thing to use nanobots/nanotech to make, develop and refine new things, quite another to inject them straight into your body without so much as a notice!
DeleteBTW- Yes, still alive (just like I most likely would be w/o the shots)- but I definitely did get Covid (not to mention sick every time I got the shot).
Deletehttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7997390/
ReplyDelete"the immense potential of nanotechnology for vaccine delivery-" makes it sound like they were used to deliver the goods... nothing about them being potential permanent guests!
Deletehttps://apnews.com/article/fact-check-COVID-mRNA-vaccine-nanotech-390958734912
ReplyDeleteI'm not buying the 5G connection either- that still doesn't excuse the rest of it... Particularly, the constant denials to and ridicule of the public concerning pumping actual nanotech machinery* into our bloodstream.
Delete*Is that more palatable than... "nanobots?"
How do we know these chemicals reactions aren't occurring all the time throughout our lives? Chemical reactions pretty always occur at the nanoscale, maybe this is the first time we get a look at them because our imaging has improved. I wouldn't jump to nefarious conclusions because of something you read on X. I'm not saying that Big Pharma isn't capable of bad things, just that there are thousands of researchers all over the world who know way more about this than we do and it's not plausible to think they're all in on it.
ReplyDeleteThis ain't something I read on X, asshat! I very specifically noted from jump that this is a peer reviewed study from the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research. Any more disinformation you purposely wish to seed, as if we haven't had enough already?
ReplyDeleteAre these "chemical reactions?" Don't think one can conflate chemical reactions with whatever the hell nanotech is doing- definite apples and oranges! Yes, chemical reactions have been occurring like... forever- as to whatever nanotech does here, that pretty freakin' recent. And BTW- stereomicroscopes (what was used here) have been around for decades.
That was a reference to the other postings with X links, so chill with your "asshat" comments. I wasn't insulting you.
DeleteSelf-assembly of molecules occurs all the time in nature. All I was suggesting was that you might be jumping to conclusions. What you need to do is consult with a biochemist to find out what that paper was actually getting at. Or don't consult with someone, I don't really care.
"I wouldn't jump to nefarious conclusions because of something you read on X."
DeleteI've pretty much restricted my end of the conversation to the confines of what is contained in the peer review, so all the sanctimonious backtracking and massaging ain't gonna work now- your initial proclamation was clear.
All those right angles and other doodads that are self assembling into 3 dimensional structures sure don't look naturally occurring to me; but by all means, yes- let science decide! The gauntlet has been thrown down. Peer reviews are vetted to confirm scientific protocol was followed, and it was quite clear in what this "was actually getting at." If you bother to read it, translation is not required. Science (using the same protocols) can now either confirm or deny- change the latter to... disprove. Somehow, I doubt neither Pfizer nor Moderna are chomping at the bit to respond... Don't think our government is either.